Canada vs New Zealand: International migration flows - Regions — New residents in the region
International migration flows - Regions — New residents in the region over time
- Canada
- New Zealand
How they compare
Canada currently reports 54,644 Persons against 48,815 Persons in New Zealand, a difference of 5,829 Persons.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.
Canada ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 22 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32,348 Persons | 85,369 Persons | 53,021 Persons | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 45,135 Persons | 106,848 Persons | 61,714 Persons | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 46,702 Persons | 52,046 Persons | 5,344 Persons | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international migration flows - regions — new residents in the region, Canada or New Zealand?
- Canada, at 54,644 Persons against 48,815 Persons in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in international migration flows - regions — new residents in the region between Canada and New Zealand?
- 5,829 Persons, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and New Zealand?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Canada and New Zealand rank globally for international migration flows - regions — new residents in the region?
- Canada ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as International migration flows - Regions — New residents in the region coming from another country. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on annual international population migration flows to and from sub-national regions, in large regions (TL2) and small regions (TL3). Data source Data is collected via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of data on small regions When demographic data are analysed along with economic data using the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting, see the list of OECD metropolitan regions (xlsx) and the EU methodology (link). Territorial typologies Small TL3 regions are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the demographic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.