Australia vs New Zealand: Long term urban population region, annual growth rate

Australia
0.1553 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Zealand
0.1789 % change on previous year
in 2025
Australia rank
169th
New Zealand rank
167th

Long term urban population region, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia
  • New Zealand
-0.2500.250.50.751195119882025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1789 % change on previous year against 0.1553 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 0.0236 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was New Zealand ahead.

Australia ranks 169th and New Zealand ranks 167th of 202 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1950s 0.4882 % change on previous year 0.4427 % change on previous year 0.0456 % change on previous year Australia
1960s 0.4472 % change on previous year 0.6776 % change on previous year 0.2304 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 0.1018 % change on previous year 0.3198 % change on previous year 0.2181 % change on previous year New Zealand
1980s 0.0037 % change on previous year 0.0706 % change on previous year 0.0669 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s 0.1704 % change on previous year 0.2214 % change on previous year 0.0509 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 0.2291 % change on previous year 0.0413 % change on previous year 0.1878 % change on previous year Australia
2010s 0.1864 % change on previous year 0.2263 % change on previous year 0.0399 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 0.1601 % change on previous year 0.1904 % change on previous year 0.0303 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher long term urban population region, annual growth rate, Australia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1789 % change on previous year against 0.1553 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in long term urban population region, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand?
0.0236 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for long term urban population region, annual growth rate?
Australia ranks 169th and New Zealand ranks 167th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Long term urban population region, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Zealand: Long term urban population region, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-urban-population-region-annual-growth-rate/australia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-urban-population-region-annual-growth-rate/australia/new-zealand/">Australia vs New Zealand: Long term urban population region, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Long term urban population region, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 15,150 data points, 1951–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Long term urban population region. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.