Colombia vs Western Sahara: Median age vs births per woman
Colombia
31.61
in 2023
Western Sahara
32.04
in 2023
Colombia rank
123rd
Western Sahara rank
120th
Median age vs births per woman over time
- Colombia
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 32.04 against 31.61 in Colombia, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Colombia ranks 123rd and Western Sahara ranks 120th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Western Sahara in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 16.27 | 21.01 | 4.74 | Western Sahara |
| 1960s | 15.33 | 22.51 | 7.18 | Western Sahara |
| 1970s | 16.59 | 18.02 | 1.44 | Western Sahara |
| 1980s | 19.23 | 20.5 | 1.27 | Western Sahara |
| 1990s | 21.85 | 19.33 | 2.52 | Colombia |
| 2000s | 24.52 | 24.15 | 0.3736 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 28.32 | 28.79 | 0.4657 | Western Sahara |
| 2020s | 31.01 | 31.5 | 0.4925 | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age vs births per woman, Colombia or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 32.04 against 31.61 in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in median age vs births per woman between Colombia and Western Sahara?
- 0.43, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Western Sahara?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Western Sahara rank globally for median age vs births per woman?
- Colombia ranks 123rd and Western Sahara ranks 120th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Median age vs births per woman. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.