Jamaica vs Western Sahara: Median age vs births per woman
Jamaica
31.67
in 2023
Western Sahara
32.04
in 2023
Jamaica rank
122nd
Western Sahara rank
120th
Median age vs births per woman over time
- Jamaica
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 32.04 against 31.67 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 122nd and Western Sahara ranks 120th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Western Sahara in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 20.71 | 21.01 | 0.3003 | Western Sahara |
| 1960s | 17.6 | 22.51 | 4.91 | Western Sahara |
| 1970s | 17.05 | 18.02 | 0.9732 | Western Sahara |
| 1980s | 19.44 | 20.5 | 1.06 | Western Sahara |
| 1990s | 21.38 | 19.33 | 2.05 | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 23.54 | 24.15 | 0.6097 | Western Sahara |
| 2010s | 27.57 | 28.79 | 1.22 | Western Sahara |
| 2020s | 30.93 | 31.5 | 0.5682 | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age vs births per woman, Jamaica or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 32.04 against 31.67 in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in median age vs births per woman between Jamaica and Western Sahara?
- 0.37, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Western Sahara?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Western Sahara rank globally for median age vs births per woman?
- Jamaica ranks 122nd and Western Sahara ranks 120th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Median age vs births per woman. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.