Which has higher median age vs. births per woman, New Zealand or Wallis and Futuna?

New Zealand, at 37.28 years against 37.17 years in Wallis and Futuna as of 2023.

What is the difference in median age vs. births per woman between New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?

0.11 years, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?

74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Median age vs. births per woman. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Zealand vs Wallis and Futuna: Median age vs. births per woman

New Zealand

37.28 years

in 2023

Wallis and Futuna

37.17 years

in 2023

New Zealand rank

81st

Wallis and Futuna rank

83rd

Median age vs. births per woman over time

New Zealand
Wallis and Futuna

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 37.28 years against 37.17 years in Wallis and Futuna, a difference of 0.11 years.

Across all 74 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 81st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 83rd of 236 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Zealand	Wallis and Futuna	Difference	Ahead
1950s	27.75 years	14.38 years	13.37 years	New Zealand
1960s	25.26 years	15.14 years	10.12 years	New Zealand
1970s	25.34 years	15.9 years	9.44 years	New Zealand
1980s	28.29 years	16.73 years	11.55 years	New Zealand
1990s	31.47 years	19.42 years	12.05 years	New Zealand
2000s	34.47 years	24.35 years	10.11 years	New Zealand
2010s	36.27 years	32.18 years	4.09 years	New Zealand
2020s	36.9 years	36.36 years	0.5353 years	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher median age vs. births per woman, New Zealand or Wallis and Futuna?: New Zealand, at 37.28 years against 37.17 years in Wallis and Futuna as of 2023.
What is the difference in median age vs. births per woman between New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?: 0.11 years, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?: 74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for median age vs. births per woman?: New Zealand ranks 81st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 83rd of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Median age vs. births per woman. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Wallis and Futuna: Median age vs. births per woman. Statizoid, drawing on UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/median-age-vs-births-per-woman/new-zealand/wallis-and-futuna/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/median-age-vs-births-per-woman/new-zealand/wallis-and-futuna/">New Zealand vs Wallis and Futuna: Median age vs. births per woman</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Median age vs. births per woman
Unit: years
Source: UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 17,464 data points, 1950–2023
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Age that divides the population into two halves of equal size — half are younger and half are older.