South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Median age vs births per woman
South Sudan
17.97
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17.81
in 2023
South Sudan rank
215th
Zimbabwe rank
216th
Median age vs births per woman over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 17.97 against 17.81 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 215th and Zimbabwe ranks 216th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 17.55 | 16.36 | 1.19 | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 17.24 | 14.76 | 2.48 | South Sudan |
| 1970s | 16.3 | 14.73 | 1.57 | South Sudan |
| 1980s | 15.72 | 14.78 | 0.9366 | South Sudan |
| 1990s | 15.88 | 15.63 | 0.2562 | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 16.57 | 17.25 | 0.6776 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 17.34 | 16.97 | 0.3642 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 17.47 | 17.6 | 0.1245 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher median age vs births per woman, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- South Sudan, at 17.97 against 17.81 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in median age vs births per woman between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.16, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for median age vs births per woman?
- South Sudan ranks 215th and Zimbabwe ranks 216th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Median age vs births per woman. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.