Australia vs Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): New internal displacements

Australia
9,909
in 2025
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
3.95 million
in 2025
Australia rank
73rd
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
70th

New internal displacements over time

  • Australia
  • Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M200820162025

How they compare

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) currently reports 3.95 million against 9,909 in Australia, a difference of 3.94 million.

That makes Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s figure about 398.4 times Australia's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 73rd and Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 70th of 170 countries.

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) Difference Ahead
2000s 4,250 717,767 713,517 Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2010s 12,558 2.24 million 2.22 million Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2020s 27,397 5.86 million 5.83 million Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher new internal displacements, Australia or Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions), at 3.95 million against 9,909 in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in new internal displacements between Australia and Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
3.94 million, with Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Australia and Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank globally for new internal displacements?
Australia ranks 73rd and Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 70th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as New internal displacements. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): New internal displacements. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/new-internal-displacements/australia/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/new-internal-displacements/australia/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/">Australia vs Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): New internal displacements</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
New internal displacements
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
323 places, 4,954 data points, 2008–2025
Last refreshed