Libya vs Papua New Guinea: Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre

Libya
3.65 people per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
3.45 people per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
204th
Papua New Guinea rank
207th

Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Papua New Guinea
01234196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 3.65 people per square kilometre against 3.45 people per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.2 people per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 204th and Papua New Guinea ranks 207th of 215 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2977 people per square kilometre 0.2919 people per square kilometre 0.0059 people per square kilometre Libya
1970s 0.8823 people per square kilometre 0.7622 people per square kilometre 0.1201 people per square kilometre Libya
1980s 1.67 people per square kilometre 1.08 people per square kilometre 0.5981 people per square kilometre Libya
1990s 2.31 people per square kilometre 1.45 people per square kilometre 0.8577 people per square kilometre Libya
2000s 2.9 people per square kilometre 1.86 people per square kilometre 1.04 people per square kilometre Libya
2010s 3.27 people per square kilometre 2.54 people per square kilometre 0.7337 people per square kilometre Libya
2020s 3.58 people per square kilometre 3.26 people per square kilometre 0.3236 people per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre, Libya or Papua New Guinea?
Libya, at 3.65 people per square kilometre against 3.45 people per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre between Libya and Papua New Guinea?
0.2 people per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Papua New Guinea rank globally for number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 204th and Papua New Guinea ranks 207th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Papua New Guinea: Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-living-in-urban-and-rural-areas-per-square-kilometre/libya/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-living-in-urban-and-rural-areas-per-square-kilometre/libya/papua-new-guinea/">Libya vs Papua New Guinea: Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of people living in urban and rural areas, per square kilometre
Unit
people per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,288 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Number of people living in urban and rural areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.