Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre

Guam
0.0365 thousands per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0339 thousands per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
34th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
35th

Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.010.020.030.04197019962023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.0365 thousands per square kilometre against 0.0339 thousands per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0026 thousands per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Guam ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 35th of 215 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0036 thousands per square kilometre 0.0087 thousands per square kilometre 0.0051 thousands per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0069 thousands per square kilometre 0.0101 thousands per square kilometre 0.0032 thousands per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0122 thousands per square kilometre 0.0116 thousands per square kilometre 0.0006 thousands per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0.0177 thousands per square kilometre 0.0138 thousands per square kilometre 0.0039 thousands per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.0249 thousands per square kilometre 0.0214 thousands per square kilometre 0.0035 thousands per square kilometre Guam
2020s 0.034 thousands per square kilometre 0.0316 thousands per square kilometre 0.0023 thousands per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre, Guam or Trinidad and Tobago?
Guam, at 0.0365 thousands per square kilometre against 0.0339 thousands per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre between Guam and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0026 thousands per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Trinidad and Tobago?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guam and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 35th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-aged-65-years-or-older-thousands-per-square-kilometre/guam/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-aged-65-years-or-older-thousands-per-square-kilometre/guam/trinidad-and-tobago/">Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre
Unit
thousands per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 10,529 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Population aged 65 years or older (thousands) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.