New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0017 thousands per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0015 thousands per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
175th

Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.002197019962023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0017 thousands per square kilometre against 0.0015 thousands per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0002 thousands per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 thousands per square kilometre 0.0005 thousands per square kilometre 0.0002 thousands per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0004 thousands per square kilometre 0.0007 thousands per square kilometre 0.0003 thousands per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0005 thousands per square kilometre 0.0009 thousands per square kilometre 0.0004 thousands per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0008 thousands per square kilometre 0.001 thousands per square kilometre 0.0002 thousands per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0013 thousands per square kilometre 0.0012 thousands per square kilometre 0.0001 thousands per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0016 thousands per square kilometre 0.0015 thousands per square kilometre 0.0002 thousands per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 0.0017 thousands per square kilometre against 0.0015 thousands per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 thousands per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-aged-65-years-or-older-thousands-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-aged-65-years-or-older-thousands-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population aged 65 years or older (thousands), per square kilometre
Unit
thousands per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 10,529 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Population aged 65 years or older (thousands) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.