Armenia vs Sacramento: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area

Armenia
11 Square kilometres
in 2030
Sacramento
323 Square kilometres
in 2030
Armenia rank
1st
Sacramento rank
1st

Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area over time

  • Armenia
  • Sacramento
0100200300197520022030

How they compare

Sacramento currently reports 323 Square kilometres against 11 Square kilometres in Armenia, a difference of 312 Square kilometres.

That makes Sacramento's figure about 29.4 times Armenia's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sacramento has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 1st and Sacramento ranks 1st of 2 countries.

Sacramento has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Sacramento Difference Ahead
1970s 5 Square kilometres 152 Square kilometres 147 Square kilometres Sacramento
1980s 5.5 Square kilometres 165.5 Square kilometres 160 Square kilometres Sacramento
1990s 6.5 Square kilometres 195 Square kilometres 188.5 Square kilometres Sacramento
2000s 8.5 Square kilometres 253.5 Square kilometres 245 Square kilometres Sacramento
2010s 9.5 Square kilometres 294 Square kilometres 284.5 Square kilometres Sacramento
2020s 10 Square kilometres 315.5 Square kilometres 305.5 Square kilometres Sacramento
2030s 11 Square kilometres 323 Square kilometres 312 Square kilometres Sacramento

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area, Armenia or Sacramento?
Sacramento, at 323 Square kilometres against 11 Square kilometres in Armenia as of 2030.
What is the difference in population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area between Armenia and Sacramento?
312 Square kilometres, with Sacramento ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Sacramento?
12 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2030.
How do Armenia and Sacramento rank globally for population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area?
Armenia ranks 1st and Sacramento ranks 1st of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Sacramento: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/armenia/sacramento/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/armenia/sacramento/">Armenia vs Sacramento: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,374 places, 16,488 data points, 1975–2030
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of population density and built-up area in FUAs and cities. Data sources and methodology FUA and city surfaces are calculated from FUA and city shapefiles, using GIS tools. Built-up data uses GHSL built-up surface grids (European Commission, GHSL Data Package 2023). Population counts are extracted from the Population by age and sex - FUAs and cities dataset. GHSL is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (100 m), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators on built-up areas. These estimates may differ from official subnational built-up statistics due to differences in methodologies, such as top down remote-sensing based estimations versus bottom up cadastral or administrative data, along with differences in satellite imagery sources, spatial resolution, and model accuracy used to detect and classify built up areas. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The definition identifies 1 285 FUAs and 1 402 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org