Dallas vs Luxembourg: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area

Dallas
984 Square kilometres
in 2030
Luxembourg
7 Square kilometres
in 2030
Dallas rank
5th
Luxembourg rank
2nd

Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area over time

  • Dallas
  • Luxembourg
02004006008001.0k197520022030

How they compare

Dallas currently reports 984 Square kilometres against 7 Square kilometres in Luxembourg, a difference of 977 Square kilometres.

That makes Dallas's figure about 140.6 times Luxembourg's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Dallas has been ahead every year.

Dallas ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 1364 regions.

Dallas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dallas Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1970s 477 Square kilometres 4 Square kilometres 473 Square kilometres Dallas
1980s 516.5 Square kilometres 5 Square kilometres 511.5 Square kilometres Dallas
1990s 593 Square kilometres 5.5 Square kilometres 587.5 Square kilometres Dallas
2000s 736 Square kilometres 6 Square kilometres 730 Square kilometres Dallas
2010s 863 Square kilometres 7 Square kilometres 856 Square kilometres Dallas
2020s 952 Square kilometres 7 Square kilometres 945 Square kilometres Dallas
2030s 984 Square kilometres 7 Square kilometres 977 Square kilometres Dallas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area, Dallas or Luxembourg?
Dallas, at 984 Square kilometres against 7 Square kilometres in Luxembourg as of 2030.
What is the difference in population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area between Dallas and Luxembourg?
977 Square kilometres, with Dallas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dallas and Luxembourg?
12 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2030.
How do Dallas and Luxembourg rank globally for population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area?
Dallas ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 2nd of 1364 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dallas vs Luxembourg: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/dallas/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/dallas/luxembourg/">Dallas vs Luxembourg: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,374 places, 16,488 data points, 1975–2030
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of population density and built-up area in FUAs and cities. Data sources and methodology FUA and city surfaces are calculated from FUA and city shapefiles, using GIS tools. Built-up data uses GHSL built-up surface grids (European Commission, GHSL Data Package 2023). Population counts are extracted from the Population by age and sex - FUAs and cities dataset. GHSL is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (100 m), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators on built-up areas. These estimates may differ from official subnational built-up statistics due to differences in methodologies, such as top down remote-sensing based estimations versus bottom up cadastral or administrative data, along with differences in satellite imagery sources, spatial resolution, and model accuracy used to detect and classify built up areas. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The definition identifies 1 285 FUAs and 1 402 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org