Luxembourg vs Tokyo: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area

Luxembourg
7 Square kilometres
in 2030
Tokyo
1,560 Square kilometres
in 2030
Luxembourg rank
2nd
Tokyo rank
2nd

Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Tokyo
05001.0k1.5k197520022030

How they compare

Tokyo currently reports 1,560 Square kilometres against 7 Square kilometres in Luxembourg, a difference of 1,553 Square kilometres.

That makes Tokyo's figure about 222.9 times Luxembourg's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Tokyo has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 2nd and Tokyo ranks 2nd of 2 countries.

Tokyo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Tokyo Difference Ahead
1970s 4 Square kilometres 1,164 Square kilometres 1,160 Square kilometres Tokyo
1980s 5 Square kilometres 1,204 Square kilometres 1,200 Square kilometres Tokyo
1990s 5.5 Square kilometres 1,282 Square kilometres 1,276 Square kilometres Tokyo
2000s 6 Square kilometres 1,414 Square kilometres 1,408 Square kilometres Tokyo
2010s 7 Square kilometres 1,496 Square kilometres 1,489 Square kilometres Tokyo
2020s 7 Square kilometres 1,552 Square kilometres 1,544 Square kilometres Tokyo
2030s 7 Square kilometres 1,560 Square kilometres 1,553 Square kilometres Tokyo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area, Luxembourg or Tokyo?
Tokyo, at 1,560 Square kilometres against 7 Square kilometres in Luxembourg as of 2030.
What is the difference in population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area between Luxembourg and Tokyo?
1,553 Square kilometres, with Tokyo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tokyo?
12 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2030.
How do Luxembourg and Tokyo rank globally for population and built-up density - cities and fuas — urbanised area?
Luxembourg ranks 2nd and Tokyo ranks 2nd of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Tokyo: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/luxembourg/tokyo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-and-built-up-density-cities-and-fuas-urbanised-area/luxembourg/tokyo/">Luxembourg vs Tokyo: Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs — Urbanised area
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,374 places, 16,488 data points, 1975–2030
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators of population density and built-up area in FUAs and cities. Data sources and methodology FUA and city surfaces are calculated from FUA and city shapefiles, using GIS tools. Built-up data uses GHSL built-up surface grids (European Commission, GHSL Data Package 2023). Population counts are extracted from the Population by age and sex - FUAs and cities dataset. GHSL is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (100 m), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators on built-up areas. These estimates may differ from official subnational built-up statistics due to differences in methodologies, such as top down remote-sensing based estimations versus bottom up cadastral or administrative data, along with differences in satellite imagery sources, spatial resolution, and model accuracy used to detect and classify built up areas. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The definition identifies 1 285 FUAs and 1 402 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Population and built-up density - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org