Peru vs Zimbabwe: Population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment
Peru
235,866
in 2024
Zimbabwe
259,552
in 2024
Peru rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
20th
Population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment over time
- Peru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 259,552 against 235,866 in Peru, a difference of 23,686.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 57 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 109,124 | 2.34 million | 2.23 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 150,418 | 2.42 million | 2.27 million | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment, Peru or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 259,552 against 235,866 in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment between Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 23,686, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment?
- Peru ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Population at risk of trachoma vs receiving treatment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.