Which has higher population by income level, per unit of gdp, Aruba or Republic of Korea?

Republic of Korea, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Aruba as of 2025.

What is the difference in population by income level, per unit of gdp between Aruba and Republic of Korea?

0 units per US$ of GDP, with Republic of Korea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Republic of Korea?

39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Population by income level, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Republic of Korea: Population by income level, per unit of GDP

Aruba

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Republic of Korea

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Aruba rank

170th

Republic of Korea rank

167th

Population by income level, per unit of GDP over time

Aruba
Republic of Korea

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Aruba, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Aruba ranks 170th and Republic of Korea ranks 167th of 211 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Republic of Korea	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
1990s	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
2000s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
2010s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Aruba
2020s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population by income level, per unit of gdp, Aruba or Republic of Korea?: Republic of Korea, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Aruba as of 2025.
What is the difference in population by income level, per unit of gdp between Aruba and Republic of Korea?: 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Republic of Korea?: 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Republic of Korea rank globally for population by income level, per unit of gdp?: Aruba ranks 170th and Republic of Korea ranks 167th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Population by income level, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Republic of Korea: Population by income level, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-by-income-level-per-unit-of-gdp/aruba/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-by-income-level-per-unit-of-gdp/aruba/korea-rep/">Aruba vs Republic of Korea: Population by income level, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Population by income level, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 211 places, 11,717 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 29 August 2026

Population by income level divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.