Ecuador vs Libya: Natural population growth rate vs. median age
Ecuador
1.0%
in 2023
Libya
1.0%
in 2023
Ecuador rank
99th
Libya rank
97th
Natural population growth rate vs. median age over time
- Ecuador
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 99th and Libya ranks 97th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.7% | 2.0% | 0.7% | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 2.9% | 3.1% | 0.1% | Libya |
| 1970s | 2.9% | 3.6% | 0.8% | Libya |
| 1980s | 2.6% | 3.0% | 0.5% | Libya |
| 1990s | 2.3% | 1.9% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural population growth rate vs. median age, Ecuador or Libya?
- Libya, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural population growth rate vs. median age between Ecuador and Libya?
- 0.0%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for natural population growth rate vs. median age?
- Ecuador ranks 99th and Libya ranks 97th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Natural population growth rate vs. median age. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Births minus deaths, as a share of the population. This is the part of population change that comes only from births and deaths, ignoring migration.