Chile vs Wallis and Futuna: Population regions with projections, annual growth rate
Chile
-1.14 % change on previous year
in 2100
Wallis and Futuna
-1.16 % change on previous year
in 2100
Chile rank
221st
Wallis and Futuna rank
223rd
Population regions with projections, annual growth rate over time
- Chile
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Chile currently reports -1.14 % change on previous year against -1.16 % change on previous year in Wallis and Futuna, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 150 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Wallis and Futuna ahead.
Chile ranks 221st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 223rd of 239 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 11 and Wallis and Futuna in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.09 % change on previous year | 0.498 % change on previous year | 1.59 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 1960s | 1.95 % change on previous year | -0.2625 % change on previous year | 2.21 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 1970s | 1.59 % change on previous year | 2.09 % change on previous year | 0.4982 % change on previous year | Wallis and Futuna |
| 1980s | 1.54 % change on previous year | 2.3 % change on previous year | 0.7558 % change on previous year | Wallis and Futuna |
| 1990s | 1.49 % change on previous year | 0.9403 % change on previous year | 0.5484 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.05 % change on previous year | -0.8696 % change on previous year | 1.92 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.22 % change on previous year | -1.36 % change on previous year | 2.58 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.4952 % change on previous year | -0.6832 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2030s | 0.1801 % change on previous year | -0.305 % change on previous year | 0.4851 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2040s | -0.0827 % change on previous year | -0.3681 % change on previous year | 0.2853 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2050s | -0.3631 % change on previous year | -0.7058 % change on previous year | 0.3426 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2060s | -0.641 % change on previous year | -0.7684 % change on previous year | 0.1274 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2070s | -0.8427 % change on previous year | -0.6445 % change on previous year | 0.1982 % change on previous year | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2080s | -1.04 % change on previous year | -0.6747 % change on previous year | 0.3676 % change on previous year | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2090s | -1.14 % change on previous year | -1.01 % change on previous year | 0.1305 % change on previous year | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2100s | -1.14 % change on previous year | -1.16 % change on previous year | 0.0193 % change on previous year | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population regions with projections, annual growth rate, Chile or Wallis and Futuna?
- Chile, at -1.14 % change on previous year against -1.16 % change on previous year in Wallis and Futuna as of 2100.
- What is the difference in population regions with projections, annual growth rate between Chile and Wallis and Futuna?
- 0.02 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Wallis and Futuna?
- 150 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2100.
- How do Chile and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for population regions with projections, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 221st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 223rd of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population regions with projections, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Population regions with projections. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.