Aruba vs Palestine, State of: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre

Aruba
599.7 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine, State of
897.79 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
15th
Palestine, State of rank
12th

Population regions with projections, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Palestine, State of
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 897.79 units per square kilometre against 599.7 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 298.09 units per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.5 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 15th and Palestine, State of ranks 12th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Palestine, State of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1960s 321.41 units per square kilometre 187.02 units per square kilometre 134.38 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 335.32 units per square kilometre 209.71 units per square kilometre 125.61 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 350.54 units per square kilometre 287.28 units per square kilometre 63.26 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 416.83 units per square kilometre 430.38 units per square kilometre 13.55 units per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2000s 521.74 units per square kilometre 586.03 units per square kilometre 64.29 units per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2010s 576.28 units per square kilometre 743.93 units per square kilometre 167.65 units per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2020s 598.21 units per square kilometre 870.28 units per square kilometre 272.06 units per square kilometre Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population regions with projections, per square kilometre, Aruba or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 897.79 units per square kilometre against 599.7 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in population regions with projections, per square kilometre between Aruba and Palestine, State of?
298.09 units per square kilometre, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Palestine, State of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Palestine, State of rank globally for population regions with projections, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 15th and Palestine, State of ranks 12th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population regions with projections, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Palestine, State of: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-regions-with-projections-per-square-kilometre/aruba/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-regions-with-projections-per-square-kilometre/aruba/west-bank-and-gaza/">Aruba vs Palestine, State of: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population regions with projections, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,288 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population regions with projections divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.