Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
39.95 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
42.24 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
160th

Population regions with projections, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Zimbabwe
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 42.24 units per square kilometre against 39.95 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 2.29 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 160th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 26.01 units per square kilometre 11.56 units per square kilometre 14.45 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 28.92 units per square kilometre 15.46 units per square kilometre 13.46 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 32.48 units per square kilometre 22.03 units per square kilometre 10.45 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 32.42 units per square kilometre 28.4 units per square kilometre 4.02 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 34.15 units per square kilometre 32.2 units per square kilometre 1.94 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 35.3 units per square kilometre 36.99 units per square kilometre 1.7 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 39.21 units per square kilometre 41.19 units per square kilometre 1.98 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population regions with projections, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 42.24 units per square kilometre against 39.95 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population regions with projections, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
2.29 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for population regions with projections, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 160th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population regions with projections, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-regions-with-projections-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/population-regions-with-projections-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/zimbabwe/">Faroe Islands vs Zimbabwe: Population regions with projections, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population regions with projections, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,288 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population regions with projections divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.