Rwanda vs South Sudan: Population regions with projections, per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0.0009 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan
0.0009 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Rwanda rank
20th
South Sudan rank
18th
Population regions with projections, per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 211 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population regions with projections, per unit of gdp, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2015.
- What is the difference in population regions with projections, per unit of gdp between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for population regions with projections, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population regions with projections, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population regions with projections divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.