Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba: Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
99.97
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
100
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
1st
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
1st

Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st of 61 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) averaged higher in 2 and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Difference Ahead
2000s 99.81 98.92 0.8941 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2010s 99.95 99.57 0.376 Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
2020s 99.97 99.99 0.0122 Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using improved drinking water sources, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using improved drinking water sources between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba?
0.03, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank globally for proportion of population using improved drinking water sources?
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 1st of 61 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba: Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-improved-drinking-water-sources/australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-improved-drinking-water-sources/australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/">Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba: Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
292 places, 7,105 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed