Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Macao: Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
99.97
in 2024
Macao
100
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
1st
Macao rank
1st
Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources over time
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), a difference of 0.03.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Macao ranks 1st of 61 groups.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.81 | 100 | 0.1887 | Macao |
| 2010s | 99.95 | 100 | 0.0505 | Macao |
| 2020s | 99.97 | 100 | 0.0253 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population using improved drinking water sources, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Macao?
- Macao, at 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of population using improved drinking water sources between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Macao?
- 0.03, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Macao?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Macao rank globally for proportion of population using improved drinking water sources?
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Macao ranks 1st of 61 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.