Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Monaco: Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
99.97
in 2024
Monaco
100
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
1st
Monaco rank
1st
Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources over time
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), a difference of 0.03.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 61 groups.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.81 | 100 | 0.1887 | Monaco |
| 2010s | 99.95 | 100 | 0.0505 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 99.97 | 100 | 0.0253 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population using improved drinking water sources, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 100 against 99.97 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of population using improved drinking water sources between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Monaco?
- 0.03, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Monaco?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Monaco rank globally for proportion of population using improved drinking water sources?
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 61 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using improved drinking water sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.