Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Naoero: Proportion of population using limited sanitation services

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
16.74
in 2024
Naoero
25.09
in 2024
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
14th
Naoero rank
12th

Proportion of population using limited sanitation services over time

  • Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
  • Naoero
1015202530200020122024

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 25.09 against 16.74 in Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions), a difference of 8.35.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.5 times Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 14th and Naoero ranks 12th of 61 groups.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 10.36 31.44 21.08 Naoero
2010s 13.72 28.44 14.72 Naoero
2020s 16.32 25.8 9.47 Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using limited sanitation services, Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) or Naoero?
Naoero, at 25.09 against 16.74 in Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using limited sanitation services between Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Naoero?
8.35, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Naoero?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Naoero rank globally for proportion of population using limited sanitation services?
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 14th and Naoero ranks 12th of 61 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using limited sanitation services (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Naoero: Proportion of population using limited sanitation services. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-limited-sanitation-services-sanitation/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-limited-sanitation-services-sanitation/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/naoero/">Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Naoero: Proportion of population using limited sanitation services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using limited sanitation services (Sanitation)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
292 places, 7,089 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed