China vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with

China
3.46
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)
0.6484
in 2024
China rank
35th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) rank
36th

Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with over time

  • China
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)
0123200020122024

How they compare

China currently reports 3.46 against 0.6484 in Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG), a difference of 2.81.

That makes China's figure about 5.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) ahead.

China ranks 35th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) ranks 36th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3333 0.6931 0.3597 Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)
2010s 1.68 0.6582 1.03 China
2020s 3.22 0.6549 2.57 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with, China or Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)?
China, at 3.46 against 0.6484 in Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with between China and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)?
2.81, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do China and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) rank globally for proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with?
China ranks 35th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG) ranks 36th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with human waste treated off-site (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-of-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-treated/china/landlocked-developing-countries-lldc-unsdg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-of-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-treated/china/landlocked-developing-countries-lldc-unsdg/">China vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDC) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with human waste treated off-site (Sanitation)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
212 places, 5,209 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed