Jordan vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with

Jordan
3.22
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
0.5418
in 2024
Jordan rank
37th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
39th

Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with over time

  • Jordan
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
1234200020122024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 3.22 against 0.5418 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), a difference of 2.68.

That makes Jordan's figure about 5.9 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 37th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 39th of 151 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Difference Ahead
2000s 3.6 0.5242 3.07 Jordan
2010s 3.52 0.5217 3 Jordan
2020s 3.29 0.5354 2.75 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with, Jordan or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
Jordan, at 3.22 against 0.5418 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with between Jordan and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
2.68, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Jordan and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank globally for proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with?
Jordan ranks 37th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 39th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with human waste treated off-site (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-of-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-treated/jordan/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-of-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-treated/jordan/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/">Jordan vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using of on-site sanitation facilities with human waste treated off-site (Sanitation)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
212 places, 5,209 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed