Iraq vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with

Iraq
25.58
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
16.8
in 2024
Iraq rank
41st
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
38th

Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with over time

  • Iraq
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
0102030200020122024

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 25.58 against 16.8 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), a difference of 8.78.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.5 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.

Iraq ranks 41st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 38th of 155 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Difference Ahead
2000s 16.32 14.8 1.52 Iraq
2010s 21.63 15.95 5.69 Iraq
2020s 25.68 16.66 9.02 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with, Iraq or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
Iraq, at 25.58 against 16.8 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with between Iraq and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
8.78, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Iraq and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank globally for proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with?
Iraq ranks 41st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 38th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with human waste disposed in situ (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-disposed-in-2/iraq/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-on-site-sanitation-facilities-with-human-waste-disposed-in-2/iraq/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/">Iraq vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using on-site sanitation facilities with human waste disposed in situ (Sanitation)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
216 places, 5,290 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed