Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Macau, China: Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
5.96
in 2024
Macau, China
79.96
in 2024
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
39th
Macau, China rank
37th

Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to over time

  • Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
  • Macau, China
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 79.96 against 5.96 in Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions), a difference of 74.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 13.4 times Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 39th and Macau, China ranks 37th of 61 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 5.12 49.84 44.73 Macau, China
2010s 5.01 60.88 55.87 Macau, China
2020s 5.87 75.94 70.07 Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to, Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 79.96 against 5.96 in Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) as of 2024.
What is the difference in proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to between Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Macau, China?
74, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Macau, China?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) and Macau, China rank globally for proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to?
Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 39th and Macau, China ranks 37th of 61 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to sewer networks and with sewage treated to at least secondary levels (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Macau, China: Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-sanitation-facilities-connected-to-sewer-networks-and-with/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-using-sanitation-facilities-connected-to-sewer-networks-and-with/eastern-and-southern-africa-unicef-prog-regions/macao-sar-china/">Eastern and Southern Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) vs Macau, China: Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population using sanitation facilities connected to sewer networks and with sewage treated to at least secondary levels (Sanitation)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
227 places, 5,567 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed