Gambia vs World Bank (low income): Proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites
Gambia
40.02
in 2024
World Bank (low income)
35.15
in 2024
Gambia rank
9th
World Bank (low income) rank
11th
Proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites over time
- Gambia
- World Bank (low income)
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 40.02 against 35.15 in World Bank (low income), a difference of 4.87.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times World Bank (low income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was World Bank (low income) ahead.
Gambia ranks 9th and World Bank (low income) ranks 11th of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and World Bank (low income) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | World Bank (low income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.15 | 32.51 | 16.36 | World Bank (low income) |
| 2010s | 30.94 | 34.25 | 3.31 | World Bank (low income) |
| 2020s | 39.65 | 35.31 | 4.35 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites, Gambia or World Bank (low income)?
- Gambia, at 40.02 against 35.15 in World Bank (low income) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites between Gambia and World Bank (low income)?
- 4.87, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and World Bank (low income)?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and World Bank (low income) rank globally for proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites?
- Gambia ranks 9th and World Bank (low income) ranks 11th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Proportion of population using unimproved sanitation facilites (Sanitation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.