Jamaica vs Maldives: Share of babies born with a low birthweight
Jamaica
13.7%
in 2020
Maldives
13.7%
in 2020
Jamaica rank
44th
Maldives rank
43rd
Share of babies born with a low birthweight over time
- Jamaica
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 13.7% against 13.7% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 44th and Maldives ranks 43rd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.7% | 13.9% | 0.8% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 13.8% | 0.3% | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 13.7% | 13.7% | 0.0% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of babies born with a low birthweight, Jamaica or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 13.7% against 13.7% in Jamaica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of babies born with a low birthweight between Jamaica and Maldives?
- 0.0%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Maldives?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Jamaica and Maldives rank globally for share of babies born with a low birthweight?
- Jamaica ranks 44th and Maldives ranks 43rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF and World Health Organization (WHO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of babies born with a low birthweight. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated percentage of newborn babies that weigh under 2.5kg. These babies are more likely to suffer poor health and stunted growth.