Aruba vs Malta: Share of population living in rural areas
Aruba
4.68
in 2020
Malta
4.89
in 2020
Aruba rank
224th
Malta rank
223rd
Share of population living in rural areas over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 4.89 against 4.68 in Aruba, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 224th and Malta ranks 223rd of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 6 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 18.49 | 9.45 | 9.04 | Aruba |
| 1960s | 15.37 | 8.76 | 6.61 | Aruba |
| 1970s | 14.52 | 8.99 | 5.53 | Aruba |
| 1980s | 11.45 | 8.13 | 3.32 | Aruba |
| 1990s | 9.14 | 6.92 | 2.22 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 6.31 | 5.92 | 0.3944 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 5.25 | 5.82 | 0.5688 | Malta |
| 2020s | 4.68 | 4.89 | 0.2104 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population living in rural areas, Aruba or Malta?
- Malta, at 4.89 against 4.68 in Aruba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of population living in rural areas between Aruba and Malta?
- 0.21, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for share of population living in rural areas?
- Aruba ranks 224th and Malta ranks 223rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of population living in rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.