Curacao vs Malta: Share of population living in rural areas
Curacao
5.42
in 2020
Malta
4.89
in 2020
Curacao rank
222nd
Malta rank
223rd
Share of population living in rural areas over time
- Curacao
- Malta
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 5.42 against 4.89 in Malta, a difference of 0.53.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 222nd and Malta ranks 223rd of 236 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 17.39 | 9.45 | 7.94 | Curacao |
| 1960s | 15.28 | 8.76 | 6.51 | Curacao |
| 1970s | 14.9 | 8.99 | 5.91 | Curacao |
| 1980s | 17.7 | 8.13 | 9.56 | Curacao |
| 1990s | 13.58 | 6.92 | 6.66 | Curacao |
| 2000s | 11.52 | 5.92 | 5.6 | Curacao |
| 2010s | 9.82 | 5.82 | 4 | Curacao |
| 2020s | 5.42 | 4.89 | 0.53 | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population living in rural areas, Curacao or Malta?
- Curacao, at 5.42 against 4.89 in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of population living in rural areas between Curacao and Malta?
- 0.53, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Malta?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
- How do Curacao and Malta rank globally for share of population living in rural areas?
- Curacao ranks 222nd and Malta ranks 223rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of population living in rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.