Israel vs Nauru: Share of population living in rural areas
Israel
6.44
in 2020
Nauru
7.64
in 2020
Israel rank
219th
Nauru rank
216th
Share of population living in rural areas over time
- Israel
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 7.64 against 6.44 in Israel, a difference of 1.2.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Nauru ahead.
Israel ranks 219th and Nauru ranks 216th of 236 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 28.59 | 100 | 71.41 | Nauru |
| 1960s | 22.04 | 100 | 77.96 | Nauru |
| 1970s | 16.5 | 17.75 | 1.26 | Nauru |
| 1980s | 13.97 | 15.33 | 1.36 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 11.39 | 12.6 | 1.21 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 8.1 | 13.89 | 5.79 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 7.19 | 10.37 | 3.18 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 6.44 | 7.64 | 1.2 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population living in rural areas, Israel or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 7.64 against 6.44 in Israel as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of population living in rural areas between Israel and Nauru?
- 1.2, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Nauru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
- How do Israel and Nauru rank globally for share of population living in rural areas?
- Israel ranks 219th and Nauru ranks 216th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of population living in rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.