Nauru vs Rwanda: Share of population living in rural areas
Nauru
7.64
in 2020
Rwanda
7.91
in 2020
Nauru rank
216th
Rwanda rank
214th
Share of population living in rural areas over time
- Nauru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 7.91 against 7.64 in Nauru, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 216th and Rwanda ranks 214th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 100 | 56.39 | 43.61 | Nauru |
| 1960s | 100 | 48.05 | 51.95 | Nauru |
| 1970s | 17.75 | 40.41 | 22.65 | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 15.33 | 31.12 | 15.79 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 12.6 | 28.39 | 15.79 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 13.89 | 19.32 | 5.44 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 10.37 | 12.74 | 2.37 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 7.64 | 7.91 | 0.278 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population living in rural areas, Nauru or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 7.91 against 7.64 in Nauru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of population living in rural areas between Nauru and Rwanda?
- 0.27, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
- How do Nauru and Rwanda rank globally for share of population living in rural areas?
- Nauru ranks 216th and Rwanda ranks 214th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of population living in rural areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.