Angola vs Bangladesh: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required

Angola
51.7%
in 2022
Bangladesh
51.0%
in 2022
Angola rank
24th
Bangladesh rank
26th

Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time

  • Angola
  • Bangladesh
20406080200320122022

How they compare

Angola currently reports 51.7% against 51.0% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.7%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Angola ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 26th of 134 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Bangladesh Difference Ahead
2000s 51.9% 84.2% 32.3% Bangladesh
2010s 37.8% 70.9% 33.1% Bangladesh
2020s 53.7% 56.3% 2.6% Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Angola or Bangladesh?
Angola, at 51.7% against 51.0% in Bangladesh as of 2022.
What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Angola and Bangladesh?
0.7%, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bangladesh?
20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do Angola and Bangladesh rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
Angola ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 26th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Bangladesh: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid, drawing on Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/angola/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/angola/bangladesh/">Angola vs Bangladesh: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
134 places, 2,380 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.