Australia vs Slovenia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required

Australia
0.1%
in 2021
Slovenia
0.1%
in 2022
Australia rank
116th
Slovenia rank
116th

Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time

  • Australia
  • Slovenia
0.10.20.30.40.50.6200320122022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 116th and Slovenia ranks 116th of 134 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% Australia
2010s 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Slovenia
2020s 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Australia or Slovenia?
Australia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Slovenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Australia and Slovenia?
0.0%, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Slovenia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
How do Australia and Slovenia rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
Australia ranks 116th and Slovenia ranks 116th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Slovenia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid, drawing on Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/australia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/australia/slovenia/">Australia vs Slovenia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
134 places, 2,380 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.