Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required

Bhutan
1.6%
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.2%
in 2022
Bhutan rank
100th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
97th

Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time

  • Bhutan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
05101520200320122022

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.2% against 1.6% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.6%.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 100th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th of 134 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 14.4% 9.5% 4.9% Bhutan
2010s 11.6% 3.2% 8.4% Bhutan
2020s 1.2% 2.4% 1.2% Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Bhutan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.2% against 1.6% in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.6%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
Bhutan ranks 100th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 97th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid, drawing on Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/bhutan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/bhutan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
134 places, 2,380 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.