El Salvador vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required

El Salvador
13.3%
in 2022
Namibia
11.5%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
66th
Namibia rank
67th

Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time

  • El Salvador
  • Namibia
10203040200320122022

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 13.3% against 11.5% in Namibia, a difference of 1.8%.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 67th of 134 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 33.0% 20.6% 12.3% El Salvador
2010s 19.5% 16.8% 2.7% El Salvador
2020s 13.7% 12.4% 1.3% El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, El Salvador or Namibia?
El Salvador, at 13.3% against 11.5% in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between El Salvador and Namibia?
1.8%, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
El Salvador ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 67th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid, drawing on Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/el-salvador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/el-salvador/namibia/">El Salvador vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
134 places, 2,380 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.