Honduras vs Mali: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Honduras
45.8%
in 2022
Mali
46.6%
in 2022
Honduras rank
31st
Mali rank
29th
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time
- Honduras
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 46.6% against 45.8% in Honduras, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mali ahead.
Honduras ranks 31st and Mali ranks 29th of 134 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.5% | 88.8% | 28.4% | Mali |
| 2010s | 52.9% | 58.9% | 6.0% | Mali |
| 2020s | 49.7% | 44.1% | 5.6% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Honduras or Mali?
- Mali, at 46.6% against 45.8% in Honduras as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Honduras and Mali?
- 0.8%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mali?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Honduras and Mali rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
- Honduras ranks 31st and Mali ranks 29th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.