Malaysia vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required

Malaysia
11.3%
in 2018
Namibia
11.5%
in 2022
Malaysia rank
69th
Namibia rank
67th

Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time

  • Malaysia
  • Namibia
101520253035200320122022

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 11.5% against 11.3% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 67th of 134 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 30.0% 20.6% 9.4% Malaysia
2010s 17.2% 17.3% 0.2% Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Malaysia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 11.5% against 11.3% in Malaysia as of 2022.
What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Malaysia and Namibia?
0.2%, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
How do Malaysia and Namibia rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
Malaysia ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 67th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid, drawing on Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/malaysia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-the-population-at-risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-when-surgical-care-is-required/malaysia/namibia/">Malaysia vs Namibia: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
134 places, 2,380 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.