Togo vs Uganda: Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required
Togo
72.4%
in 2022
Uganda
68.4%
in 2022
Togo rank
13th
Uganda rank
15th
Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required over time
- Togo
- Uganda
How they compare
Togo currently reports 72.4% against 68.4% in Uganda, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uganda ahead.
Togo ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 15th of 134 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.2% | 90.4% | 11.2% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 70.9% | 73.7% | 2.8% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 68.0% | 69.1% | 1.1% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required, Togo or Uganda?
- Togo, at 72.4% against 68.4% in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required between Togo and Uganda?
- 4.0%, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Uganda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Togo and Uganda rank globally for share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required?
- Togo ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 15th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Harvard Medical School Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population at risk of catastrophic spending when surgical care is required. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out-of-pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.