Kiribati vs South Sudan: Share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita
Kiribati
66.55
in 2020
South Sudan
65.17
in 2020
Kiribati rank
158th
South Sudan rank
160th
Share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita over time
- Kiribati
- South Sudan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 66.55 against 65.17 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.38.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 158th and South Sudan ranks 160th of 236 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 7 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 24.82 | 14.58 | 10.24 | Kiribati |
| 1960s | 29.9 | 18.21 | 11.7 | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 34.42 | 22.51 | 11.92 | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 31.64 | 28.45 | 3.19 | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 37 | 34.18 | 2.82 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 45.59 | 42.7 | 2.89 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 54.06 | 56.57 | 2.51 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 66.55 | 65.17 | 1.38 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita, Kiribati or South Sudan?
- Kiribati, at 66.55 against 65.17 in South Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita between Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 1.38, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
- How do Kiribati and South Sudan rank globally for share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita?
- Kiribati ranks 158th and South Sudan ranks 160th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of the population living in urban areas vs gdp per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.