Burkina Faso vs Timor-Leste: Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking
Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking over time
- Burkina Faso
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 82.0% against 81.0% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 30th and Timor-Leste ranks 31st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.0% | 97.6% | 1.6% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 91.3% | 0.2% | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 84.8% | 83.8% | 1.0% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking, Burkina Faso or Timor-Leste?
- Burkina Faso, at 82.0% against 81.0% in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking between Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste?
- 1.0%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste rank globally for share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking?
- Burkina Faso ranks 30th and Timor-Leste ranks 31st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of population without primary reliance on clean fuels and technology is calculated as the number of people unable to use clean fuels and technologies for cooking, heating and lighting divided by total population reporting that any cooking, heating or lighting, expressed as percentage. “Clean” is defined by the emission rate targets and specific fuel recommendations (i.e. against unprocessed coal and kerosene) included in the normative guidance WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion.