Kiribati vs Vanuatu: Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking
Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking over time
- Kiribati
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 80.0% against 76.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 35th and Vanuatu ranks 32nd of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.8% | 87.0% | 10.8% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 93.8% | 85.6% | 8.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 81.2% | 81.2% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking, Kiribati or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 80.0% against 76.0% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking between Kiribati and Vanuatu?
- 4.0%, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Vanuatu?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Vanuatu rank globally for share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking?
- Kiribati ranks 35th and Vanuatu ranks 32nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of population without primary reliance on clean fuels and technology is calculated as the number of people unable to use clean fuels and technologies for cooking, heating and lighting divided by total population reporting that any cooking, heating or lighting, expressed as percentage. “Clean” is defined by the emission rate targets and specific fuel recommendations (i.e. against unprocessed coal and kerosene) included in the normative guidance WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion.