Australia vs Lithuania: Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by

Australia
2,260 Persons
in 2024
Lithuania
22 Persons
in 2024
Australia rank
7th
Lithuania rank
4th

Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by over time

  • Australia
  • Lithuania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k201420192024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,260 Persons against 22 Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 2,238 Persons.

That makes Australia's figure about 102.7 times Lithuania's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 4th of 26 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 4,434 Persons 21.5 Persons 4,413 Persons Australia
2020s 1,601 Persons 13.6 Persons 1,588 Persons Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher standardised inflows of temporary migrants — migration flows by, Australia or Lithuania?
Australia, at 2,260 Persons against 22 Persons in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in standardised inflows of temporary migrants — migration flows by between Australia and Lithuania?
2,238 Persons, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for standardised inflows of temporary migrants — migration flows by?
Australia ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 4th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by category. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Lithuania: Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/standardised-inflows-of-temporary-migrants-migration-flows-by-category/australia/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/standardised-inflows-of-temporary-migrants-migration-flows-by-category/australia/lithuania-2/">Australia vs Lithuania: Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Standardised inflows of temporary migrants — Migration flows by category
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
34 places, 351 data points, 2014–2024
Last refreshed

This database provides estimates of annual temporary migration flows to OECD countries. The estimates are mainly based on the number of newly granted permits/visas issued to foreign citizens, provided by NSOs or Ministerial statistical services. Temporary migration flows are classified into 6 groups: international students newly registered in a tertiary education programme; migrants participating in a work-travel exchange programs; intra-corporate transferees; trainees; seasonal foreign workers; and other foreign workers participating in national temporary migration programmes. Note that selected temporary movements are excluded from our estimates of temporary migration inflows. These are: tourists; crews; persons in transit; business visitors; diplomats; journalists; job-search visa holders; religious workers; sportspersons; artists; performers; posted workers. Short-term movements under free-movement agreements are not included in this dataset. Asylum seekers are not included in this data set. See the following tables. Ukrainians under the Temporary Protection Directive are not included in this data set. Further information: International Migration Outlook