El Salvador vs Kiribati: The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
El Salvador
94
in 2022
Kiribati
93
in 2022
El Salvador rank
40th
Kiribati rank
41st
The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- El Salvador
- Kiribati
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 94 against 93 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 41st of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.57 | 54 | 35.57 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 90 | 87.56 | 2.44 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 92.67 | 93 | 0.3333 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, El Salvador or Kiribati?
- El Salvador, at 94 against 93 in Kiribati as of 2022.
- What is the difference in the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 1, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Kiribati rank globally for the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- El Salvador ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 41st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.