Guatemala vs Namibia: Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Guatemala
90.0%
in 2022
Namibia
90.0%
in 2022
Guatemala rank
55th
Namibia rank
55th
Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Guatemala
- Namibia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 55th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.5% | 80.4% | 10.9% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 87.5% | 85.4% | 2.1% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 90.7% | 90.0% | 0.7% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Guatemala or Namibia?
- Guatemala, at 90.0% against 90.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Guatemala and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Guatemala ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 55th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.