Kiribati vs Laos: The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Kiribati
93
in 2022
Laos
93
in 2022
Kiribati rank
41st
Laos rank
41st
The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Kiribati
- Laos
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 93 against 93 in Laos, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 41st and Laos ranks 41st of 106 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54 | 49.71 | 4.29 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 87.56 | 86.67 | 0.8889 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 93 | 93 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Kiribati or Laos?
- Kiribati, at 93 against 93 in Laos as of 2022.
- What is the difference in the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Kiribati and Laos?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Laos?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Kiribati and Laos rank globally for the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Kiribati ranks 41st and Laos ranks 41st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.