Kiribati vs Solomon Islands: The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Kiribati
93
in 2022
Solomon Islands
93
in 2022
Kiribati rank
41st
Solomon Islands rank
41st
The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Kiribati
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 93 against 93 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 41st and Solomon Islands ranks 41st of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54 | 80.29 | 26.29 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 87.56 | 85 | 2.56 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 93 | 90 | 3 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Kiribati or Solomon Islands?
- Kiribati, at 93 against 93 in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Solomon Islands?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Kiribati and Solomon Islands rank globally for the percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Kiribati ranks 41st and Solomon Islands ranks 41st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as The percentage of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.