Malaysia vs Suriname: Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Malaysia
95.0%
in 2022
Suriname
95.0%
in 2022
Malaysia rank
35th
Suriname rank
35th
Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Malaysia
- Suriname
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 95.0% against 95.0% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Malaysia ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 35th of 106 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.2% | 92.4% | 5.2% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 90.6% | 93.0% | 2.4% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 95.0% | 95.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Malaysia or Suriname?
- Malaysia, at 95.0% against 95.0% in Suriname as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Malaysia and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and Suriname ranks 35th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.